Become an Anime Billionaire Tier List Method

A source-backed Become an Anime Billionaire tier-list method using live cash contribution, roll evidence, variants, cost, and update confidence instead of fabricated ranks.

A defensible Become an Anime Billionaire tier list must compare characters from the same update and account conditions. Current sources confirm the roll and money loop and provide readable examples such as Naruto, Golden Vegeta, and the code reward Kiriko, but they do not provide enough matched base tests to publish a named S/A/B roster. This page gives a ranking method and a dated evidence board so future results can be added without guessing.

Current evidence board

CharacterCurrent source-backed fieldsRanking status
NarutoName visible during the opening tutorial; equipped and placed on one accountNeeds a full result screen and same-condition base comparison
Golden VegetaGolden variant, Uncommon rarity, 1 in 16, and $645 displayed on a July roll resultNeeds the labeled base contribution and acquisition cost under comparison conditions
Kirikothisissecret is cross-confirmed to award 1 unitNeeds in-game variant, rarity, cash, and placement evidence

This is already more useful than a fabricated list because it tells players what is known, where the character came from, and which screen would complete the comparison.

Rank one goal at a time

Do not combine every purpose into one unexplained grade. Use separate goal tiers:

GoalHigher-tier evidence
First-session valueImproves an open base position with little or no cash spent
Cash productionProduces a larger repeatable collection result under matched conditions
Roll efficiencyProvides useful improvement relative to the live roll cost and odds
Replacement valueClearly improves an occupied position after accounting for the sale or change
Progression recoveryReaches the same cash checkpoint faster after a documented Rebirth

A character can rank differently for each goal. A code reward may be excellent for starting without proving it is the best late-run producer.

Use practical comparison tiers

For a single account and update, sort tested characters like this:

  • S for the chosen goal: repeatably produces the best measured result among the tested candidates, with the complete screen and conditions recorded.
  • A: a clear improvement that remains close to the best result and is practical to acquire or place.
  • B: useful in an open slot or as a fallback, but outperformed in the same test.
  • C: does not improve the tested base under the recorded conditions.
  • Unranked: missing a name, comparable cash result, cost, source, or update context.

These are editorial tiers, not official labels. Publish the measured values next to any future named placement so readers can audit the decision.

Collect comparable character data

  1. Record the exact name from the result or Index.
  2. Separate variant, rarity, and odds fields.
  3. Note the acquisition source and resource spent.
  4. Capture the current base before replacement.
  5. Place one candidate and record the labeled collection result.
  6. Restore the baseline, place the other candidate, and repeat.
  7. Keep active luck, Rebirth state, and other upgrades unchanged.
  8. Date the comparison and retain screenshots.

Do not compare a roll-screen $ value with a placed-character collection amount unless the game labels them as the same measure.

Add confidence to each tier

Strength and evidence confidence are separate:

  • High confidence: repeatable live tests or creator-published current data under matched conditions.
  • Medium confidence: two current gameplay sources show the same result with enough context.
  • Low confidence: one readable observation with missing comparison fields.
  • Unranked: the name or important performance field cannot be confirmed.

Golden Vegeta has a useful readable result screen, but one result does not establish an S-tier performance rank. Kiriko has strong acquisition evidence across several sources, but no comparable stats in those articles.

Recheck after updates

Repeat the comparison when roll odds, result values, collection timing, upgrade choices, or Rebirth behavior change. Keep the old table dated. Do not silently merge screenshots from different versions or servers into one ranking.

The fastest warning sign is a live result that no longer matches the recorded variant, rarity, odds, or cash line. Move the old row into history and test the new build.

Frequently asked questions

Why is there no named S-tier yet?

The current sources do not provide matched base tests for a full roster. Publishing names without those comparisons would repeat the fabrication problem this Wiki is correcting.

Is Golden Vegeta better than Naruto?

The July recording shows different fields and progression moments, not a controlled side-by-side base test. Compare both on the same account conditions before ranking them.

Is Kiriko the best starter?

Kiriko is obtainable through a cross-confirmed code, which makes her worth inspecting immediately. Her production and tier still require the live unit screen and base comparison.

Can rarity alone determine a tier?

No. Rarity and odds describe availability. The selected tier goal requires performance, cost, and context.